Clarifying wrong concepts of some Viryas, regarding the Serpent!

https://taplink.cc/hyperboreanwisdom

Clarifying wrong concepts of some Viryas, regarding the Serpent!

With all the burden of so many centuries of rejection of the serpent and the reptilian as initiatory, it is not surprising that even today, some Viryas also maintain that cultural filter, responsible for a epistemological color blindness, when addressing the understanding of the serpent.

First of all, it should be noted that the serpent must be understood from the symbol of origin, as Nimrod de Rosario well refers. This noological understanding necessarily corresponds to the realm of the spirit in the Origin, and therefore it would be a mistake to assign to this ophidic dimension a framework in the realm of the soul.

The Siddhas themselves, in their expression of essential hostility, and maintaining the Vril, have chosen to express themselves in this regard, which they still maintain in the world of Agartha.

And so it must be until we definitively leave for the uncognizable world, where such an unknowable area is purely runic.

Furthermore, the strategy of adopting the reptilian aspect obeys clear reasons, of staying out of everything soul, and from the cold blood evade the entire archetypal whirlwind without being captured by such unfolding or framework.

Of course there are also hyperborean expressions of combat and hostility from the Bersekir fury, such as the wolf and the bear. More again, in these mammalian forms, the predatory and attack aspect has its root and expression in the reptilian brain.

Thus in such cases, the soul dimension has been completely resigned, and the bear or wolf warrior, a Virya or even Siddha under such aspects, maintains the reptilian predator as the axis of its tactical movements.

So it is clearly understandable, that it is from the hard and cold, the stone and the reptile (which in the initiatory instance come to be the same) how a Siddha should be mobilized.

This question should not be confused with demiurgic archons, which sometimes also display a reptilian or ophidic aspect, but in this case the difference is clear, since they do not exhibit essential hostility to the world of matter, nor the orientation or axis focused on the Origin.

And in this case, if we are dealing with a reptilian archetypal expression.

This clarification is extremely important, so as not to confuse the hyperborean lizardmen of Venus with a type of variety of the alien race, creation of the demiurge.

That is, the lizard men of Venus (What are they called that because they entered this world through the door of Venus, and not because their last origin is Venusina) they are not a race of this world.

The essential antagonism of the demiurge to gigantic reptiles of yesteryear, was evidenced by the extinction caused by dinosaurs.

The way in which the fossils of many dinosaurs were found, with the head thrown back, the back and tail reversed and the limbs retracted, suggest a death by suffocation or poisoning., More surprising, is that this « extinction » did not affect other life forms present, be they aquatic beings, amphibians, crocodiles, etc.

So it was undoubtedly a « selective death », and therefore planned.

The confusion of this reptilian theme is increased with the synarchic disinformation exposed by some ufologists, proposing that the so-called reptilians or lizard men, they are one of the many races of this creation., From other planets they say, but as part of the « creation in this universe »., And that is the fundamental error, since lizard men come from the uncreated world, Hyperborean.

And today, they are in Agartha's extra-dimensional world, in connection with Venus.

As also referred to in the Foundations of Hyperborean Wisdom, Lilith and Lucifer are not archetypes, but a memory in the memory of blood or Minne, of the original couple.

And remember that Ophis Lucifer is the serpent God, as well as Lilith the serpent woman. Therefore, these serpentine, ophidic aspects clearly correspond to the realm of the spirit in the Origin.

There are viryas who, under this confusion of concepts (Due in part to impurity of blood, remnants of Judeo-Christian cultural influence, and synarchic disinformation) , They have considered that both reptilian cold blood and mammalian warm blood should be resigned, (as if both were of a Pasú component), to arrive at hyperborean blood.

Let's clarify this. First of all, the mammalian warm blood corresponds to Pasú, who was a hominid. Not so the cold reptilian blood.

The Siddhas, all of them, when they enter this world, even before dividing into two groups, assume the reptilian form equally.

So the reptilian matrix, and its cold blood, come from the Siddhas (traitor Siddhas when they copulate with the Pasú race, but Siddhas at last), and not of Pasú as the work of the demiurge. The Pasú was just a hominid, Neanderthal class.

It is from the Cromagñón, father of the current white race, that the lost Virya appears, possessing both a hominid matrix (inheritance or legacy of the Pasú) and a reptilian matrix (legacy of hyperborean blood).

So, it is not as some Viryas put it, that one must first enter or locate himself in reptilian blood, from there go beyond the reptilian cold blood to the hyperborean blood. By contrast, reptilian cold blood is the racial expression of the hyperboreal spirit in this world.

Their first manifestation of fact, since the Siddhas enter through the gate of Venus, and aspect that they keep to this day in Agartha, as can be seen in the description of Siddha Kiev: ” because it gave it the undoubted aspect of a being from another world, or belonging to an unknown Race, were his eyes devoid of a pupil, only composed of an emerald green iris: those eyes, devoid of human expression, testified to the disturbing evidence that the History of man has forgotten something; something that perhaps it is inevitable to remember in our Epoch ”…

Because also but the reference given to Ophis Lucifer, the serpent God?

It is positioning itself in cold blood, resigning soul life (this expression of the warm mammalian blood), how the symbol of origin can be clearly and consciously reflected, coldly to this whole world, and in essential hostility.

Nor is it that you have to get out of the reptilian blood, or resign it, to express the bersekir fury from « a hyperborean blood that would be beyond or outside the reptilian blood ». Rather, it is from the cold-blooded hyperborean reptile that such a state is expressed.

What are the Saurians perhaps but a reptilian expression of pure Bersekir fury?

So the Virya, from its hybrid nature, must first dominate and resign the ape-like aspect. Such is the work to the black or Nigredo, in terms of alchemy. Then, it must be positioned on its reptilian side, that is, the stage known as Albedo. (Cold blood, and Archcephalon).

This aspect is maintained strategically until the final battle!

Battle that will take place not only in this and other planes of significance, but also in the reptilian Venusian context of origin, since it was from that area and its projection on this plane, that the disagreement and division of the Siddhas took place on two sides.

Finally, in the final departure from this world, the work is consumed in Luciferian red or Rubedo. In this instance the hyperboreal spirit is pure rune, and it can be expressed or manifested in different aspects, from the absolute, infinite and uncreated.

A concept that gives rise to misunderstandings is sometimes the symbol of the Pasú of the spiral.

Although in a first approximation it can be associated with the snake, due to its spiral-shaped appearance when coiled, despite this, In Foundations of Hyperborean Wisdom it is explained that such a representative spiral of Pasú corresponds to the functional matrix of evolutionary development, and is a semiotic expression of the snail design.

It is also distinguished later with respect to different forms of spiral.

The subject of the relationship between the serpent design and the snail design has been masterfully exposed by the Pontiff, Nimrod of Rosario, in Foundations of Hyperborean wisdom, and does not require further comments. It is better to quote the Pontiff verbatim, to make this point clearly stated: » It is clear, then, that the law of evolution is expressed by the fixed spiral of the design of the snail and not by the variable spiral of the design of the serpent » (FSH, Volume 2, article C , The snail and the snake).

So, taking up the starting point, it would be wrong to take such a symbol of the Pasú as representative of the serpent.

And in whatever way you want to see or interpret, you have no relationship with Ophis Lucifer, the serpent God.

Another mistake and deviation in which some viryas fall is to postulate that you must first resign yourself and eventually kill the snake. Nimrod de Rosario never says that the snake must be killed, but understood, from the beginning.

In any case, when it is proposed to resign the snake or fight the dragon, it must be specified that the demiurgic serpentine aspect is being alluded to, or the demiurgic dragon Enlil. It is also spoken in a figurative sense of the dragon of Sodom, etc.

But the emphasis on this question should not cloud or make forget the Siddhas' own hyperboreal reptile aspect.

In this sense, from the perspective of combat, there are those who propose to confront the serpent, the reptile, and the dragon.

And they omit or do not know that in the return to the origin, when the activation of the reptilian matrices of the origin is encouraged, the Virya must assimilate the aspects , essence and power of the serpent (His wisdom and poison / antidote / elixir), the lizard (the cold blood) and the saurian (beer bersekir fury).

Similarly, Siddhas have entered this world, under the guise of Saurios, lizardmen, and serpent men.

Nor is it valid the argument that the angular runic is opposed to the winding serpentine, since in the case of Lucifer and the loyal Siddhas, the reptilian aspect is fully functional to the runic strategy.

The isolated Self in the archhemone of the Odal rune has completely resigned the subject and soul environment, positioning itself in the cold blood of the reptile.

And the nonological transit to Selbst, is because the snake has « acquired wings », in the same way as the winged representation of the Pegasus unicorn octopus, implies an elevation above the condition of the soul, orienting itself to the spirit.

Thus the Virya is like a Quetzalcoatl, or winged serpent, or even like Siddha a winged dragon.

And it is still significant, the colors with which the analog model of the sphere spirit has been allegorically represented. In its normal condition, green on the inside and red on the outside. Which in the reptilian context alluded to, suggests the image of a green lizard with a red crest.

Then, in the reversal, the green interior has been exteriorized. Which suggests the blurring of the Vril, (Vril evoked in the suggestive reptilian green, which must be recovered). And red, the expression of essential hostility of the Bersekir fury, has been hidden or strategically neutralized. Such is the oblique meaning of representative colors in the analogy of the sphere spirit.

Continuing with the wrong or deviant approaches, another error is the one that certain viryas affirm regarding that after understanding the serpent with the sign of origin, the dragon must be understood with the symbol of origin.

The confusion here is that the sign of origin is the outward expression (visible to the awakened virya) of the symbol of origin found in astral blood. That is, the symbol of origin is expressed externally (they say that in the ear area) as the sign of origin. They are not two different runic expressions. Then, the understanding of the serpent with the symbol / sign of origin, is a noological understanding, so it already understands all the aspects in which the serpent can manifest, including the most oblique, like the dragon.

Hence, understanding the serpent with the symbol of origin, already understands or includes an understanding of the dragon aspect.

To conclude this review and analysis of some concepts from hyperborean wisdom, although in many myths they are presented in contrast to the bird (aguíla, crow, peacock etc) and the serpent, and in others in a conciliatory form of opposites, it is not wise to conceive of the eagle (or another bird in question), as an aspect of necessary understanding after the snake and the lizard. In this regard, the initiatory value of the wings, representative of the birds, has also been included in a highly oblique plane of expression of the serpent. Such is the case of Quetzalcoatl, » The feathered serpent », or even the dragons themselves. Since the dragon is, after all, a kind of winged serpent.