Transcendent Metaphysical Polytheism
Claudio Mutti, the poster boy of Islamofascist 'traditionalism', wrote an article entitled, "Divine Unity in the Hellenic Tradition", purporting to subordinate the various Hellenic deities under a monotheistic umbrella as means of pandering to his demographic of so-called 'traditionalists', specifically islamists attempting to ingratiate himself with this Abrahamic (semitic), collective, and to thereby appeal to them, to amalgamate the polytheistic paganism and the Abrahamic monotheism. Such an endeavor could, of course, only bear the most bitter fruits and indeed mere desiccated seeds unworthy of the name 'fruit', let alone the green fruit of Yggdrasil or the golden apples of Idunn.
The pagan polytheism which existed in the ancient Aryan world was invariably a vital and dynamic system not based on any unity but on that of plurality, on that of the gods not as mere 'archetypes', or hypostases of 'the One', but rather of a higher world and worlds populated with rulers and subordinates whose form of behavior was intelligible to the population and which prescribed lessons of an ethical nature exoterically and within the inner circle of initiates, an ontological, gnoseological meaning which enabled a greater comprehension of the higher planes through Gnostic understanding or knowledge, properly so-called 'experiential knowledge'.
Thus, any notion of a 'divine unity' of such 'hypostases', is only meaningful in a barren sense and viewed from the frog perspective of the Demiurge, viewed from the lower perspectives of His creation and of Himself, exalting a barren abstraction called 'Oneness', whilst condemning as mere 'paganism', the gods who are posited as inferior to the 'Demiurge', though they may indeed be above Him.
In presenting such a biased slant the frog perspective of the Demiurge, Allah, as opposed to the eagle-eyed vision of the gods (who are equal to, if not greater than the Demiurge, all of whom emanate from the Black Light) the endeavor of Mutti, (the mutt of semitized Italy), to subordinate the gods to an overarching 'one god' (Allah/Brahma/Jehovah, etc.), is to slander the gods or at least to cast aspersions against their nature and to posit or exalt that which is at most equal to them as an individual, though likely subordinate to them as individuals and certainly subordinate to them as a collective.
Therefore the alleged 'unity', within or under the hegemonic influence of the Demiurge of the gods as mere hypostases of 'the One', is an absurdity, indeed a Syrio-African absurdity and therefore, indeed 'Hellenic', in the sense of Hellenism, that which usurped the autonomy and cultural supremacy of the Greco-Roman tradition, that of the already degraded Hyperborean culture and attempted to supplant it in characteristically semitic guile, expanding its hegemonic influence over the then rapidly degrading cloaca gentium of the Near East and Mediterranean sewer basin.
Hence the notion that Hellenism is based upon a 'divine unity', is valid, but Hellenism is not Greco-Roman, let alone Hyperborean, as it is of semitic origin being imported from Syria into the Mediterranean region more largely and spread itself virally around infecting the consciousness of the population with the virus of semitism.
Though Mutti appears to be referring to the Greco-Roman 'tradition', in his article, whether consciously and with deliberate ambiguity or unwittingly and in sincerity, he posits the supremacy of not only the proto form of monotheism, that being Hellenism, but reaffirms it in a later arabized context of islam, which he himself adopted as his creed.
The creed of the Aryan has always been 'transcendent metaphysical polytheism', i.e., a weltanschauung in which a plurality of separate and individual Immortal gods interacted with the mundane population of the folk and were always involving themselves in relations therewith, instructing them in conferring upon the mortals their wisdom-if deemed worthy, based upon their virtuous life (virtuous in the Aristotelian sense of the qualities of excellence embodied in the being).
The culture of the blood pact is that of the Hyperboreans and it is this which is diametrically oppositional to that of the culture pact, as reflected in any mainstream monotheistic religion, wherein any may participate as long as they abide by the rules and live a life of slavish subordination to the priest caste and/or become something, priests themselves. Thus, the distinction between the Aryan and Hyperborean 'culture', or pact with that of the semite and other pasu beastmen is that between the 'blood pact', based upon blood and the culture pact, based upon artificial unity and certainly not, 'divine', but simply 'Demiurgic', the culture pact, pactus diabolus of the goyim, the priests of the order of Melchizedek and Jehovah-Satan.