essential study, nothing is more explicit and goes deeper than his work. Nimrod de Rosario confuses things and is alleged to have been CIA yet his work is also quite insightful though conflictual with Serrano's and as Serrano said is "jewish gnosticism".
Rosario is divisive indeed. I would stick with Serrano myself though there are rare gems in Rosario especially in terms of details found nowhere else in as explicit form.
Miguel possessed invaluable knowledge regarding Lucifer and the Black Sun.
essential study, nothing is more explicit and goes deeper than his work. Nimrod de Rosario confuses things and is alleged to have been CIA yet his work is also quite insightful though conflictual with Serrano's and as Serrano said is "jewish gnosticism".
I'm in the process of finishing Nimrod de Rosario's Foundations after his novel, and although this is indeed a very interesting work, I'm wary of it.
I'll comment more extensively once it's finished and if it's worthwhile.
What did you get from it on your side?
Rosario is divisive indeed. I would stick with Serrano myself though there are rare gems in Rosario especially in terms of details found nowhere else in as explicit form.