This inevitably reminds me of when I grew up christian and the debates between the different sects of Christianity boiled down to a few points, one of them being about good works vs a preset life of eternity. Seems similar to the overarching comparison of serrano and rosario that be it that it may be rosario is more on the side of a predefined script or preset eternal manifestations that are just here in this age of time but wont be in the next age of time already written for us. Although Serrano defines this age as one that still needs to have the action of the aryans and some working of the script to make it the way we want it to be. Maybe its just that rosario is more implicit on hyperborean wisdom and serrano is more explicit on hyperborean wisdom. When we say gnostic in terms of our side of things we should take note that this is how we track back, from our current age in time, to the true timeline in time in order to truly realize the real Kristos, of Kristianity, not "of" gnosticism but referenced "from" there by the synarchy in a sense. From what Ive studied though rosario has more handle on reversing the black magic through more inner type work, while Serrano has the amora and other plans for outer works.
Rosario has more in the way of tactics contra the synarchy yes. Serrano is more historical analysis but his analysis is confused and 'synarchic' in too many ways...
Yes it seems at this point the soul is another material form that helps that body so the argument can non-whites have a soul yes but in question I believe this is a pseudo soul or lesser form. As in white have a higher level of soul as in helped them attain the level of knowledge in science and architecture and literature, in the material form. The main topic then is the spirit which has no color nor race and in this case any bodily vessel may have a spirit of lesser or higher form, while most living on earth have the basic minimal spirit just necessary to comprehend it in itself to a point of view.
This inevitably reminds me of when I grew up christian and the debates between the different sects of Christianity boiled down to a few points, one of them being about good works vs a preset life of eternity. Seems similar to the overarching comparison of serrano and rosario that be it that it may be rosario is more on the side of a predefined script or preset eternal manifestations that are just here in this age of time but wont be in the next age of time already written for us. Although Serrano defines this age as one that still needs to have the action of the aryans and some working of the script to make it the way we want it to be. Maybe its just that rosario is more implicit on hyperborean wisdom and serrano is more explicit on hyperborean wisdom. When we say gnostic in terms of our side of things we should take note that this is how we track back, from our current age in time, to the true timeline in time in order to truly realize the real Kristos, of Kristianity, not "of" gnosticism but referenced "from" there by the synarchy in a sense. From what Ive studied though rosario has more handle on reversing the black magic through more inner type work, while Serrano has the amora and other plans for outer works.
Rosario has more in the way of tactics contra the synarchy yes. Serrano is more historical analysis but his analysis is confused and 'synarchic' in too many ways...
Yes it seems at this point the soul is another material form that helps that body so the argument can non-whites have a soul yes but in question I believe this is a pseudo soul or lesser form. As in white have a higher level of soul as in helped them attain the level of knowledge in science and architecture and literature, in the material form. The main topic then is the spirit which has no color nor race and in this case any bodily vessel may have a spirit of lesser or higher form, while most living on earth have the basic minimal spirit just necessary to comprehend it in itself to a point of view.